Designers and developers of a world-class IT learning experience stake their reputations on delivering successful learning outcomes, but what does that actually mean? We define successful learning outcomes as individuals that exit a training program expressing overall satisfaction with the learning experience and equipped with job-ready technical skills that they can put to use immediately. This degree of success is impossible without information and strategy alignment in three critical areas:

1. The Current Technical Environment

Gaining a better understanding of the current employee population will help set a baseline for course participation volume, curriculum concentration, and what type of learning environment will best serve the employees. To that end, conduct an initial assessment that pinpoints:

  • Size & demographic information
  • Existing IT skills within the workforce
  • IT skills gaps

 2. Challenges Preventing Business Growth

It is impossible to properly tailor a program to meet the needs of your organization or to leverage learning outcomes to meet new organizational goals without a thorough awareness of the challenges currently standing in the way of growth:

  • Budget & resource limitations
  • Flexibility, mobility, and accessibility
  • Potential events that can disrupt learning

3. Desired Business Outcomes

You can’t define learning outcomes if you haven’t defined your desired business outcomes. For the record, knowing that your workforce needs more skilled technical laborers is not enough to deliver a return on educational investments. The most successful learning outcomes are the result of reverse engineering. Organizations clearly define what they wish to achieve in the future, what IT skills are needed, and for what purpose. With specific insight, program designers and curriculum developers can customize coursework to create a pathway that gets the organization from where it is to where it wants to be. In addition to delivering desired learning outcomes, this approach ensures that organizations:

  • Train for the skills they want, not the skills they already have.
  • Attract and enroll the right caliber of learners.
  • Establish a process for measuring progress & success.

Of course, there’s a lot more to building an internal training program for IT skills development than these three elements. From designing an effective enrollment process and creating high-quality content to hiring instructors and assessing learners, effective IT training programs involve a lot of moving parts that must all work in tandem to deliver a cohesive learning experience. To help organizations understand the full scope of what goes into building and deploying an accelerated training program, we did a breakdown of costs and considerations. Check it out.

Accelerated employee training bootcamps for IT skills development represent one of the most affordable solutions to the IT talent shortage that most organizations face. Although these programs offer a faster, less expensive alternative to higher education, the average price is still roughly $13,584 per student.

Due to a gap in alternatives, some organizations have started teaming up with business-to-consumer bootcamp providers to solve internal IT talent issues. It’s important for corporate leaders to understand enough about the costs involved to avoid unnecessary expenditures. As one of the original bootcamp creators for Java and .NET coding, I can tell you from experience — the amount of labor, content, and resources needed to build and deploy one of these programs can add up fast.

To help you make smart financial decisions without jeopardizing the quality of your training program or the employee experience, I’m lifting the curtain on all of the cost factors involved in developing a consumer-facing bootcamp program. Use this insight before adapting an employee training solution for your organization to ensure that your investment pays dividends in advanced IT skills and capabilities.


$1,000 – $3,000 per enrolled student

For bootcamp programs to be successful, they need to attract enough learners to support the cost of deployment, which makes enrollment a particularly important factor to consider. The costs associated with enrollment can vary between providers and will depend on two things:

Competitive Forces

Generally speaking, the more regional competition a bootcamp provider has, the higher their operating costs will be. Between marketing and sales functions to gain program traction, and battling other providers for the internal talent needed to execute programs, it’s a pay-to-play industry. By default, those higher operating costs eventually trickle down to the cost of service.


There are two basic approaches to enrollment for bootcamp-style IT training programs:

Selective Enrollment ($$)

Some providers believe in a selective, multi-step enrollment process, including interviews, aptitude assessments, and pre-work courses. Each step adds cost to the bottom line in the form of labor, content creation, tracking systems, etc. While the initial cost is higher, so are the program outcomes due to careful learner placement.

Open Door ($)

Other bootcamp providers have more of an “open door” enrollment process that accepts anyone able and willing to pay. Participation numbers may be higher due to this type of program’s accessibility, but without a process in place to vet qualified candidates, the program outcomes may be less impressive.


$1,500 to $4,000 per student

When it comes to employee training programs, instruction represents the largest expense by far. Several factors play into the cost of instruction and, coincidentally, the caliber or value of the program investment:

Classroom instructors ($$$)

$90,000 – $150,000 per classroom instructor (annually).

The classroom instructor is the “lead” educator, which means they are primarily responsible for delivering content, mentoring learners, and assessing progress. These professionals have at least 5+ years of instruction experience in addition to first-hand industry experience, plus a laundry list of soft skills (e.g., active listening, information delivery, empathy, etc.). A classroom instructor’s salary can vary significantly based on experience level, skill sets, and geography.

Support instructors ($$)

$75,000 – 130,000 per support instructor (annually).

Support instructors assist classroom instructors during off-hours or with overflow work when things get busy, similar to a teacher’s aid in traditional education. While support instructors are valuable assets to a bootcamp provider’s educational team, they do not have the industry or teaching experience needed to lead a classroom on their own.

Lower quality bootcamps will often try to cut costs by hiring recent bootcamp graduates as classroom instructors. For this reason, it is imperative that organizations look into the experience level and quality of a provider’s instructor staff before opting into an IT training program.

Part-Time Instructors ($$)

$35 to $60 per hour

Some program schedules are part-time only,  meaning classes are held after hours or on the weekends. In such cases, many instructors work full-time jobs, and moonlight as teachers in their off-time, which makes their cost considerably lower than a full-time instructor. Once again, the hourly rate for a part-time instructor will depend on skill level, experience, and geography.

Instructor Resources ($)

$55 per hour for part-time instruction resources.

$70 per hour for full-time instruction resources.


Class size will influence whether or not an IT training program needs additional instructor resources, such as a part-time or support instructor, to manage the workload. Smaller classes can get away with less instructional staff. As the class size grows larger, more instructors will be necessary to ensure the best student experience. Generally speaking, we recommend an additional instructor resource for every 14 learners. Using this as a benchmark in addition to the average hourly rates for instructor resources, the estimated cost breakdown based on class size looks similar to this:


# Students Length


Instruction Costs Cost / Student
Full-Time Part-Time Full-Time Part-Time
14 400 $28,000 $22,000 $2,000 $1,571
20 400 $56,000 $44,000 $2,800 $2,200
14 480 $33,600 $26,400 $2,400 $1,886
20 480 $67,200 $52,800 $3,360 $2,640
14 560 $39,200 $30,800 $2,800 $2,200
20 560 $78,400 $61,600 $3,920 $3,080

Additional Cost Factors


Program Length

Predictably, the longer the program runs, the higher the cost will be per student. However, I recommend caution when attempting to reduce costs here. Cutting the length of the program to lower costs could jeopardize the learning experience and the quality of job-ready skills produced by the program.



These programs are referred to as bootcamps for a reason. We’re talking about intense training sessions that demand much from learners and instructors alike. Most full-time instructors can handle 3 to 4 classes per year before burnout sets in. While limiting workloads is vital to maintaining health and satisfaction, it also means that they will be paid for downtime, a cost factor that ultimately inflates the cost per student.


Operational & Overhead Costs

$1,500 per student.

Like any other business, there are a variety of operational and overhead costs associated with running an IT training program. To name a few:

  • Accounting & Legal – Accounting costs can range from general bookkeeping to administering loan programs and payment plans while legal costs are largely influenced by contracts, compliance, and regulatory filings.
  • Space & Equipment – Rent and equipment costs will change drastically depending on the size of the program and the number of concurrent classes in session. Keep in mind, especially in reference to physical space, these costs are also hyper-sensitive to geography.
  • Operations & Management Staff – IT training programs are intricate and require a seasoned team of professionals to answer phones, manage instructors and learners, run day-to-day activities, monitor performance, and much more. The human capital required to execute a consistent and dependable program is no small feat (or investment).

Curriculum & Content

$250,000 – $1,000,000

There are several ways to deliver curriculum and content, including written material, slides, demos, labs, assessments, and video. The quality of a program’s curriculum and content has an impact not only on the student experience but also the ability to scale a program. A well-designed and maintained curriculum pays dividends to the program in several ways:

  • It increases the odds that students will achieve the desired outcome (job-ready skills).
  • It reduces the burden on instructors to deliver content synchronously (what we call the “sage on the stage” approach).
  • It makes hiring and training new instructors easier by providing sufficient “rails” for them to follow.

Creation & Development

However, creating said content and curriculum is no small feat. For perspective, it took me about eight months to create slides, labs, and assessment materials for the original .NET full-stack bootcamp I founded back in 2013. This set me up to deliver a “sage on the stage” experience (lecture-style instruction) where I had the resources to actively present information every morning and mentor or answer questions every afternoon. All-in, the time and materials cost was around $250,000 for what amounted to limited scale content.

I refer to the initial content as limited-scale because, without rich content like video (which happens to be the most expensive content to create) or instructor guides and resources, it would have been impossible for another instructor to step in, pick up the lesson plan, and teach the program. When the program expanded, and we needed to hire additional instructors, I had to personally train each of them and hold regular meetings to ensure that they were using the course materials as intended. As a result, the cost burden was exponentially higher.

To reduce this cost, we put a year of our time and funds into creating premium content, such as video, and instructor guides. The investment improved the learning experience for both instructors and students and enhanced the program’s scalability. However, reducing the cost burden associated with hiring and training instructors meant spending more on additional support staff, such as video editors, instructional designers, copy editors, etc.

Overall, the price to recreate our curriculum and content development and delivery model clocked in at over $500,000. Well worth the investment, but certainly not a one-time expense. I have seen other, less efficient organizations spend over $1M on content creation.

Curriculum Maintenance

Annual updates and maintenance – 30% of the initial cost.

Technical training curriculum must be actively maintained and updated to keep up with rapid changes in technology. This is a significant cost that also gets worked into the program’s tuition. However, the amount is typically amortized over several years.


Career Services

$40,000 to $100,000 per year

$500 to $1,000 per student per year

Be aware of turnkey training programs that offer services you don’t need. For example, many bootcamp programs include career services as a core part of their solution, such as job search tools and resources, or even dedicated job placement personnel who actively seek career opportunities for learners. In a program that runs three or four classes per year, a single career support professional could add another $500 to $1,000 to the cost per student. As an employer, you clearly don’t want or need these services, but that doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for them.

Summing IT Up

To understand the full financial picture, let’s look at a typical mid-market bootcamp with one program that runs eight (8) 12-week classes per year. Assuming that 20 students are enrolled in the program, requiring four full-time instructors over a period of 3 years, the cost breakdown looks something like this:

Length (Hours) 480
Programs / Year 8
Years 3
Total Students 480 * 20 per program
Instruction Cost $ 1,612,800
Curriculum Build Out $ 500,000
Curriculum Maintenance $ 300,000 * 2 years at 30% of initial build
Career Services $ 225,000 * 3 years, $75,000 per year
Enrollment Costs $ 720,000 * $1,500 per student
Operations/Overhead $ 720,000 * $1,500 per student
Total Cost of Program $ 4,077,800
Cost Per Student $  8,495.42

In a perfect world scenario (absent any instructor turnover, drop-outs, unexpected legal costs, partnership fees, or costs associated with running a loan or ISA program, etc.), we easily reached a cost per student of $8,500.

As a program provider in a competitive region, this leaves little room (if any) for profit, leading many providers to cut corners as a way to improve margins. In an industry with underdeveloped regulatory oversight (a discussion for another day), the potential is high for employers to unknowingly invest in a low-quality learning experience that fails to deliver consistent outcomes.

There’s a Better Way to Bootcamp…

Stage 3 Talent is the byproduct of my search for a better, more cost-effective way to rapidly train and upskill workforces for industry 4.0 and beyond. Rather than invest in a turn-key program with limited cost/control flexibility, we help corporations build their own internal training programs in less time, with lower start-up costs. More importantly, we ensure that education results in the job-ready skills your organization needs to stay relevant, competitive, and essential in its respective industry.

Find out how we reduced program costs by 47% for one client and lowered their cost-per-student by almost half. Download the Case Study

Learn more about Eric Wise.

A recent survey from the Strada Education Network showed that 52% of Americans felt they had limited opportunity to advance at their work. What’s worse, 46% felt that there was not an equal opportunity for them to advance in their respective industry because they are a member of a minority group.

Equity in the workplace (not to be confused with equality) is a problem that even the most neoteric companies can’t seem to solve. Case in point — numerous tech giants have a reputation for driving progress in social activism and workplace diversity. Yet, they are overwhelmingly led by white men. Where are all the minority leaders?

Presumably, these organizations have noble intentions. They nurture the right mindset, adopt equality as a core pillar of their company values, and invest in diversity and inclusion initiatives. But, without equity, even positive action can plateau and cease to impact change.

Equity vs. Equality

Equality is like serving the same exact meal to a room full of people regardless of age, gender, race, religion, ethnicity, etc. Each person has a seat at the table, a place setting in front of them, and staff to deliver their food. But without special consideration for food allergies or dietary restrictions, some people are inadvertently excluded from partaking in the free meal. This is called inequity.

As it relates to career advancement opportunities, such as access to training and employee development, inequity might look like:

  • Limited access to a computer or internet service at home.
  • A less inclusive employee experience due to remote placement.
  • Language barriers that prevent employees from understanding growth opportunities.
  • Learning disabilities that discourage employees from seeking career advancement opportunities.

Equitable Training for Employee Development

The only way to solve inequity in education is to acknowledge the varying needs and learning preferences across your workforce and address them systematically to ensure that all employees have not only equal opportunities for professional development, but also the resources, understanding, and support needed to recognize and take equal advantage of those opportunities.

This is where bootcamp-style training (designed for generalized deployment) falls short. While great for a population of learners who have similar starting skills, end goals, learning styles, resources, and support, the odds of a bootcamp program meeting a variety of varying employee needs is rare, if not impossible.

The most equitable approach to training and employee development is to build your own in-house corporate training academy.

3 Ways an In House Training Academy Improves Equity

By design, in-house training programs  incorporate three essential elements needed to improve equity in employee education:

1. Career Mapping

Employees don’t always know how to go from where they are now to where they want to be. Many of them might not even have a “destination” or career goal in mind. Without a plan for the future, they cannot effectively seek out relevant experiences or training opportunities.

Building an in-house corporate training program involves a discovery phase that analyzes your current workforce’s potential, needs, and limitations. When paired with structured career mapping, coursework can be tailored to support highly specific goals and pave strategic pathways that benefit the employee and the future of the business.

2. Skill Audits & Assessments

Program designers must understand the current and desired skill levels of an employee population before they can develop a training academy that delivers tangible outcomes. With turnkey solutions like technical bootcamps, programs are made to fit the current environment, and goals are adapted to fit the program. Inevitably, there will be areas that do not align perfectly, each representing ROI vulnerability.

Building your own internal training academy involves a thorough skills audit and ongoing skills assessments, allowing program designers to reverse-engineer an employee learning environment and curricula based on real-time skill demands, learner performance, and future changes that will impact employee roles.

3. Research & Refinement

For education to be equitable, employees need to be invited into the conversation — period. In large enterprises, it’s not always practical for employers to regularly correspond directly with employees. However, that doesn’t mean leaders can’t create avenues for communicating real-time employee needs.

With the right educational partner, internal training academies can be designed to closely survey learners and instructors to keep a pulse on preferences and satisfaction levels, ensuring that all voices are heard. Most importantly, these programs allow employers to take action on what they learned.

Technical bootcamps lack agility, making changes and improvements painstaking work. Altering curricula or tweaking program deployment can significantly increase the cost-per-student and takes considerable time to launch. On the other hand, building an internal corporate training academy offers the flexibility to test programs, study performance and satisfaction, make revisions, and enhance the experience in less time and with less cost.

Be it language, geographic, or social barriers;  employers need to do better at connecting the right employees with the right opportunities. By design, building an in-house training academy requires employers to create processes for understanding what “the right” opportunities are and how to ensure employees have equal access, resources, and support based on their unique needs.

Developing and branding your own corporate training academy also ties learning into the fabric of your company culture. Rather than an employee benefit, career advancement becomes a part of the company mission, resulting in a more unified, targeted, and agile workforce capable of absorbing change and converting evolutionary forces into forward momentum.

Think you can’t afford to build an in-house training academy? Think again. It’s actually more affordable than you think. We break it down for you in our next article. Stay tuned!

On January 1, 2021, Colorado’s new Equal Pay for Equal Work Act went into effect, requiring all entities with at least one employee in Colorado to provide formal notice of “promotional opportunities” and disclose pay rates or ranges in job postings for jobs that will be or could be worked in Colorado (including remote openings).

The purpose of the act is to prevent pay disparities and increase pay equity and transparency. Despite noble intentions,  the act kicked up quite a bit of dust, forcing companies to give up their hand during employee negotiations, reassess recruiting practices, and update internal procedures for promoting employees or processing internal position changes.

As a result, many big-name organizations, including Airbnb, Cardinal Health, Century 21, and many more, have posted job listings that explicitly state details such as “remote work available, except for in Colorado” to avoid having to share salary information.

Here’s a complete list:

Leaders Are Missing The Point

When negotiating the terms and salary of a position, applicants and potential employers enter into a brief adversarial relationship. Naturally, both parties want to get the best deal possible and use whatever leverage they have to do so. A considerable portion of that leverage is information, hence the fuss over companies having to enter negotiations with all of their cards face-up on the table.

Low-balling someone’s value is never a good idea. Neither is paying every employee their maximum value, which leaves zero room for error, adding stress to the role and making expectations higher than what is reasonable. The solution isn’t for employers to win the better part of the employment deal at all. It’s to create the right deal that equally benefits employees and the organization at large. In other words, adding value to a position in other creative ways and making the job about so much more than a paycheck.

Instead of fixating on Colorado’s new legislation and how to maneuver around it, organizational leaders should focus on the impact that this act will have on long-term hiring trends and employee expectations.

Rather than fight the renaissance, employers should rethink their employee benefits program, company culture, and career development opportunities.  

The Great Resignation

If there’s one silver lining to COVID-19, it’s how the pandemic made people reevaluate what’s important in life and what truly makes them happy, particularly on the job front. Furthermore, waiting out a pandemic during the largest unemployment episode since the Great Depression made workers keenly aware of their value and marketability. Earlier this year, CNBC reported on an American Worker survey conducted by Prudential Financial. At the time of the survey (March 2021), 1 in 4 employees was considering quitting their job after the pandemic. Of those planning to jump ship:

  • 80% were motivated by concerns about their career advancement.
  • 72% said the pandemic caused them to rethink their skill sets.

Achievers’ 2021 Engagement and Retention Report also found that more than half of employees (52%) plan to leave their jobs this year, citing the desire for better employee benefits as one of the top reasons why. We’re talking about millions of workers leaving or planning to leave their employers in search of better opportunity — an unprecedented event experts are calling “The Great Resignation”.

In essence, the pandemic spurred employees to start rocking themselves out of career ruts. If employers want to keep top talent, they need to create more pathways for career advancement, more opportunities for employees to develop new skills (particularly IT skills), and more work flexibility that allows employees to integrate careers with all other aspects of life.

Internal Training Academies – The New Wellness Program?

Wellness programs were a relatively new concept back in the early 2000s. Over the years, their marked value and effectiveness at improving employee health and company culture turned wellness programming into a staple of most employee benefits programs today. In the years to come, we’re going to see a similar trend gain traction, but, this time, it’s building internal training academies that provide IT skills training for upskilling and reskilling employees.

Internal training academies not only represent the most effective solution for closing the IT skills gap; they also address new and emerging employee expectations for career development and growth. Like wellness programs, there are several options for how organizations will implement training academies, including bootcamp-style delivery models. However, the most practical and (surprisingly) affordable approach is to partner with a technical education provider that can help you custom build and deploy a proprietary internal program designed to meet the exact specifications of your workforce, business goals, and current skill sets.

To learn more about what it takes to launch an internal training academy for IT upskilling, reskilling, and employee development, download our Essential IT Skills Training Program Planner.

Celebrities reinvent themselves all the time. In some cases, it’s to escape a scandal (cough, Robert Downey Jr., cough). In other cases, it’s to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of a ruined reputation (here’s lookin’ at you, Brittney Spears). Some celebrities just want to be taken more seriously (Adam Sandler in Reign Over Me, you are the reigning champion). Today, we’re highlighting five mega-stars who made brilliant use of their creativity, capital, and celebrity status by reinventing themselves into tech moguls. After all, music albums and movie roles come and go, but if there’s one thing we know with absolute certainty, it’s that an investment in technology makes a whole lot of business sense. 

Ashton Kutcher

Actor, Product Engineer

Ashton’s role as Steve Jobs in the biographical movie, Jobs might have been a fine display of acting, but his education and experience as a product engineer is the real deal. Prior to his big acting break as the character Kelso in That 70’s Show, Kutcher studied biochemical engineering. The Hollywood mega-star has since used his fame to invest in tech businesses, including Uber, Spotify, and Shazam — but that’s not all. Kutcher also dabbles in computer programming. That’s right; he knows how to code. In 2009, Kutcher teamed up with his then-wife, Demi Moore, to co-found Thorn, a nonprofit organization that develops tools and technologies to help companies and authorities eliminate human trafficking and child sexual exploitation. In 2013, he took his IT skills a step further when Chinese computer maker, Lenovo, hired Kutcher as a product engineer for its Yoga line of tablets, which features a built-in projector. 

Lyndsey Scott

Model, Actress, Computer Programmer

Lyndsey Scott was the first African American model to sign a contract with Calvin Klein, but don’t let the “dumb model” stereotypes fool you. Scott is anything but vapid. In fact, she earned dual degrees in Theater and Computer Science and spends much of her time as Lead iOS Engineer for Rallybound, which enables her to write code and build mobile apps for non-profit foundations, including the Susan G. Komen Foundation, AIDS Walk, and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. In addition to nonprofit coding and software development, Scott also builds mobile applications to help actors and actresses practice and remember their lines. She’s also a contributor to, where she teaches introductory coding tutorials. aims to expand children’s access to computer science education and increases participation by young women and students in underserved communities. If you read our two-part series on women in technology, you know how jazzed we are about this mission. Check out the articles below.

Women in Tech: Part 14 Factors Prolonging the IT Skills Gender Gap

Women in Tech: Part 2An Untapped Market For IT Skills

Ja Rule (formerly known as Jeffrey Atkins)

Rapper, Actor, Software Founder 

Fun Fact: Once upon a time, Ja Rule liked and replied to a Tweet sent by our director of marketing, Katy Bright. (Clearly, she knows how to engage an audience). Few celebrities have transformed themselves as many times as the “hardcore” rapper turned actor, Ja Rule. Truly, the man is an enigma. After a brief foray into talent booking for the infamous Fyre Festival, Ja Rule underwent a complete personal brand makeover and graduated from a four-week business program at the renowned Harvard University. Today, he is in hot pursuit of multiple tech investments. In 2020, he partnered with a team of software engineers to develop a mobile app ironically named, Iconn — a live streaming marketplace designed to connect celebrities, artists, athletes, and influencers with their biggest fans. Get it? I con…with Fyre Fest still looming in his recent past, the name is a bit of a zinger, but nonetheless earns a 5-star review in the Apple App Store. Ja Rule also co-founded Flipkick, a first-of-its-kind digital art platform that authenticates the selling of tangible art via a “cryptographically secure link” to an NFT. What can’t this blast from the early 2,000s past do? 


Jeffrey Allen “The Skunk” Baxter

Musician, Producer, & Missile Defense Systems Consultant

You might know ”The Skunk” from the 1960’s music scene. Does Steely Dan or The Doobie Brothers ring a bell? Baxter spent the first half of his career as a guitarist for the iconic bands before going solo to strum alongside the musical stylings of Eric Clapton, Dolly Parton, Sheryl Crow, Ringo Starr, Carley Simon, Gene Simmons, Elton John, and a slew of others as a session guitarist. In the 1980s, his career in music recording technology heightened his curiosity and interest in hardware and software development. In a strange twist of fate, the guitarist began studying missile defense systems and eventually wrote a paper on the subject that caught the attention of the U.S. government. By the 1990s, he was working as a defense consultant for the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency, the U.S. Department of Defense, and numerous other government agencies.

Leonardo DiCaprio

Actor, Environmentalist & Technology Investor

Leonardo DiCaprio *swoon* is one of the greatest actors and activists of our time. The movie Titanic might have launched his career, but what DiCaprio chose to do with his fame and fortune will become his true legacy. In 1998, just a year after his maiden voyage into colossal career success, DiCaprio started the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, which dedicates resources to addressing urgent environmental and humanitarian issues. Not exactly a deep dive into technology — yet. 

In the years to follow, DiCaprio would go on to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars in various tech start-ups — all leading up to his most recent power-play that will finally bridge his penchant for environmental activism with advanced technology. The actor is said to have invested a “significant” amount in Struck Capital, a seed venture firm that intends to turn L.A. into the premier innovation and technology hub. More specifically, the firm funds visionary technologists as they innovate ways to solve the world’s largest problems, such as climate change and wildlife preservation. 

Society looks to celebrities for inspiration on how to dress, what to think, and, of course, what constitutes entertainment. But rarely do we look to these creatives for business or career insight. These five celebrities aren’t the only ones securing their future success by tossing a hat into the technology ring. This summer, computer science skills are the new black. 

Developing IT skills across your workforce and reinventing how your business operates is more affordable than you think. Download our Essential IT Skills Training Program Planner to learn more about how to develop and deploy a training and employee development program for IT upskilling.